تاريخ تركيا الحديث

Erik-Jan Zürcher إريك زوركر

You are here: Home - Books - تاريخ تركيا الحديث


تاريخ تركيا الحديث

تاريخ تركيا الحديث By Erik-Jan Zürcher إريك زوركر TLS SOAS

  • Title: تاريخ تركيا الحديث
  • Author: Erik-Jan Zürcher إريك زوركر
  • ISBN: -
  • Page: 274
  • Format: None
  • تاريخ تركيا الحديث By Erik-Jan Zürcher إريك زوركر , , 1950 TLS SOAS .
    تاريخ تركيا الحديث By Erik-Jan Zürcher إريك زوركر

    • [Ê تاريخ تركيا الحديث || Õ PDF Read by ó Erik-Jan Zürcher إريك زوركر]
      274 Erik-Jan Zürcher إريك زوركر
    • thumbnail Title: [Ê تاريخ تركيا الحديث || Õ PDF Read by ó Erik-Jan Zürcher إريك زوركر]
      Posted by:Erik-Jan Zürcher إريك زوركر
      Published :2019-010-26T18:24:22+00:00

    One thought on “تاريخ تركيا الحديث

    1. Merve on said:

      Kapsaml ve tarafs z tarih okumak isteyenler i in ideal Anl anl , epik hikayeler dinlemeyi sevenlere tavsiye edilmez.

    2. Anonimo on said:

      I read a lot of history so I know a good history when I see one This book is history as it ought to be written It is not only modern in the sense that it covers the modern era it is modern in its approach to history, giving due weight to economic and social factors and citing scholarship on the cutting edge for each chapter The idea of the book is that modern Turkey did not begin abruptly with Ataturk s republic but rather began sometime around 1800 The story of the decline of the Ottoman empire [...]

    3. Rob Prince on said:

      This book is better than the 3.48 rating given it by other readers Much better Replaces and is a distinct improvement over Bernard Lewis old classic, The Emergence of Modern Turkey If it is not exciting in the sense that it is straight political history, it contains a wealth of information of value, especially the parts about how Turkey got screwed through the Versailles Treaty at the end of World War One, the emergence of a new modern Turkish nationalismAs Turkey seems to be emerging as a force [...]

    4. Aydin on said:

      Jon Turkler den itibaren genel bir ozet okumak icin tercih edilebilir ancak i 60 ve 80 darbelerini ikinci ve ucuncu cumhuriyet olarak tanimlamak, 1923 e haddini asan bir hakaret olmakta ve ii 12 Eylul deki insan hakki ihlallerini iki cumlede gecistirmek kitaba olan guveni etkilemekte Cok detayli bir tarihi calismadan ziyade, genel kulturu arttirmaya yonelik bir okuma olarak degerlendirilmesi gerektigini dusunuyorum.

    5. Turhan Dilmaç on said:

      18 y zy l sonundan 2000 li y llar n ba na kadarki uzun d nemi kapsama iddias esere fazla gelmi Bu sebeple gerek elendirilmemi ve iyi i lenmemi genellemeler olduk a fazla, ayr ca farkl dinamikleri olan siyasi, toplumsal ve ekonomik hadiseler a r basite indirgenerek yorumlanmak zorunda kal nm T rk siyasi tarihine yeni ba layanlara ya da eski bilgilerinin zerinden h zl ca ge mek isteyenlere tavsiye edilebilir belki Terc me ba ar l.Ayn yazar n yine leti imden kan Milli M cadelede ttihat l k kitab is [...]

    6. Güney Tombak on said:

      Nutuk u temel alan ve oldum olas kendimizi vmeyi bitiremedi imiz formal e itimin tarih ili ine kar , olaylar ve olgular aras dinamikleri anlamak a s ndan g zel bir eser Ben tarih i de ilim ve belki de eser be y ld z hak etmiyor ama puan n n d k olmas nda ger ek olmas muhtemel olgular hazmedemeyenlerin etkisi oldu unu d n yorum.T rk Osmanl tarihi hakk nda, III Selim den g n m ze kadar gelen, objektif buldu um ve yorumlara a k oldu unu da belirten, temel al nabilecek bir zet.

    7. Emirhan Özay on said:

      Z rcher d nemle tirmelerin tart mal ve keyfi oldu unu s yl yor Ger ekten de yle Kitap giri niteli inde ele al n rsa keyfi d nemle tirmeler yeni ve ferah bir bak a s olarak g r lebilir Ancak belli bir perspektife sahip bir okuyucular i in yazar n d nemle tirme ve eklektisizmleri belli bir hatta oturuyor.Kitab n tezi cumhuriyetin ilk on y llar nda ger ekle tirilen radikal d n mlerin uzun s ren bir modernle me s recinin zirvesi oldu u Bu zirve Osmanl mparatorlu u nda artan Avrupal n fuzun aya olan [...]

    8. Eya Beldi on said:

      So good, so detailed It takes a while to read it but definitely a knowledge enricher I would recommend it to anyone who wants to read Turkish history starting from long term reasons of the ruin of the empire I think the books starts in 1839 or a few years before that with the Tanizimat era.

    9. Davide Clementi on said:

      Il libro, ormai un classico per chi volesse seguire uno studio accademico della storia della Turchia, esamina con chiarezza le vicende che portarono alla creazione della Repubblica di Turchia sin dall Ottocento dal periodo riformatorio dell impero Ottomano alla sua fine, ai movimenti nazionalisti prima, durante e dopo la Grande Guerra, fino alla proclamazione kemalista della Repubblica.L approccio dell autore sicuramente controcorrente rispetto al comune pensare su Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, figura [...]

    10. Anders Hjortshøj on said:

      A solid and very well researched guide to the emergence of the Turkish republic and its many transformations, taking great care to emphasize continuities with the late Ottoman period and pick apart the Kemalist mythology that passes for historiography Z rcher is in particular excellent on party politics and manages to navigate or less readably through endless jungles of intrigue and shifting allegiances These aspects may be overemphasized ever so slightly to the detriment of social, cultural an [...]

    11. Ali Gül on said:

      Tek kelimeyle, muazzam T rkiye nin bug nlerini anlamak, as rlar s ren m cadelenin ekilleni ini takip etmek i in harika bir kaynak Z rcher in Kemalistlere tarafl bak n da tolere edebilece inizi d nerek yaz yorum bunlar.

    12. Merve Akpınar on said:

      One the best books i have ever read on the modern history of Turkey, The Turkish translation is terrible therefore i recommend you to read it in English.

    13. Dorukhan Köksal on said:

      Sa lam bir kaynak a sunmas na ra men tarihsel olgular materyalist bir bak a s yla de il de kronolojik olarak sunmakla yetinen ve tarihin itici g c n kuvvetli liderlere ve onlar n kaprislerine havale eden bir kitap Tarihi hap olarak okumak isteyenler i in ideal kitapt r ancak Cumhuriyet Devrimi ni derinlemesine renmek isteyenler i in i inde bir ok sakatl klar bar nd ran y zeysel bir al mad r Dikkatli okuyucular, yazar n T rkiye tarihi zerine retti i tezlerin dinci gericiler taraf ndan 2000 li y l [...]

    14. Harun Gökçe on said:

      19 as r ve sonras tarihi genel hatlar yla iyi organize edilmi bir yap da sunan ba ar l bir kitap Ciltlerle anlat labilecek bir tarih aral n t m detaylar yla anlatmas n boyutu itibariyle beklememek gerekse de bilinen baz olaylar aras ndaki detay derinli indeki farkl l klar g ze arpabilir Sonu olarak, giri seviyesinde, objektif ve ba ar l anlat m yla okunmas gereken bir eser.

    15. Zeynep on said:

      Osmanl n n son zamanlar ndan T rkiyenin kurulu u ve 2000lerin ba lar na kadar zet halinde lkenin modernle mesi ana temas zerinden yak n tarihe ayna tutan bir al ma.Ayr ca ders kitab olarak okutulan,olaylara tarafs z bir ekilde bakmaya al an bilimsel bir kaynak tavsiye edilir

    16. Robert Morris on said:

      This is an academic text It is well written, and can be quite interesting, but its narrative is second to its thoroughness I was already familiar with much of the history described, so I found it useful If I were looking for an introduction to Modern Turkey, it might be better to look elsewhere The book was better about distant time periods, where the historical interpretations are settled The material on the 18th century was especially interesting The coverage got less convincing as the book [...]

    17. Tuncay Özdemir on said:

      smail Cem in T rkiye de Geri Kalm l n Tarihi isimli kitab n okuduktan sonra okumu olmam ok daha iyi oldu ki kitap da T rkiye nin ayn d nemine odaklan yor Dolay s yla benzer olaylara hangi yazar n hangi perspektiften bakt n g rmek i i daha da ilgin k l yor.Kitap bence genel olarak fena de il T rkiye nin yak n tarihine kronolojik olarak g zel bir bak sa l yor Okunmas kolay, evirisi olduk a ba ar l Ancak Erik Jan Z rcher, tarihi olaylara her ne kadar objektiflikle yakla t iddias nda olsa da bir ok [...]

    18. Rob on said:

      Hard to imagine anyone doing a better job of this and the text is almost clinical in its description of a country that has modernized dramatically over the past two centuries a central thesis of the book avows that westernization and secularization were far from the work of Atat rk alone while, as ever, economic considerations are every bit the equal of political ones.Not that Armenians requiring greater coverage of the 1915 massacre or Greek communities whose ancestors were expelled from Smyrna [...]

    19. Gregory Meul on said:

      Voor wie op zoek is naar spanning en avontuur zoals ikzelf is dit boek allesbehalve een aanrader Door de oneindig vele aaneenschakelingen van namen en gebeurtenissen heb ik me er echt door moeten worstelen, al ligt dat waarschijnlijk aan het feit dat politieke en economische geschiedenisboeken me minder kunnen boeien Wel kan ik met enige trots zeggen dat ik dankzij het boek de staatsgreep van vorige week in het land perfect kan kaderen Dus tevergeefs was het zeker niet Op naar het volgende boek

    20. AskHistorians on said:

      This book, while lacking in primary source references in some spots, is the most expansive modern history of a country that I ve ever read It manages its events in a clear way, and connects the important events to the overall history of the middle east Starts in the Late Ottoman Empire and brings us through today Does a great job balancing social, political, cultural, and economic history, though the pieces added for later editions the parts covering after 1980 give less focus to social and cult [...]

    21. Lorientas on said:

      It is a very interesting period for Turks and Europeans so I had a positive bias before starting and It really satisfied my curiosity It is a very brief book and I am sure that there are very detailed books for the same period However it is a good place to start and it gives a good idea about the roots of current political struggles of Turkey It was a fairly objective book and I did not feel any biased presentation Obviously this is my subjective judgment but I can easily say that writer tries t [...]

    22. Simon Woell on said:

      digs deeper in turkeys history than most other books on the issue as it starts with the end of the 18th century the description of the ottoman empire is very good and easily readable for a broader audiance, so is the part about modern turkey which gives me as a political scientist some headache the concept of a book that describes 250 years of history must be somehow vague, but it gives a perfect overview for starting students and everyone else interested.

    23. htanzil on said:

      Buku karya Zucher ini merupakan buku teks yang sangat tepat bagi para akademisi yang hendak menyelami kajian mengenai Turki Selain itu buku ii merupakan baha yang berharga bagi mereka yang mencari sebuah keterpaduan interpretasi mengenai sejarah Turki yang disampaikan dngen begitu memikat dan koprehensif Buku ini benar benar sebuah referensi tentang Turki Lawrance Tel, International Affairs

    24. Ruhat alp on said:

      Bernard Lewis in Modern T rkiyenin Do u u isimli lber ortayl n n ise mparatorlu un en uzun Y zy l isimli kitaplar n a maya al an,fakat bence a amayan bir kitap.Yeni bir yakla m zellikle kemalizme resmi ideoloji d nda yakla maya al mas ,tek adam k lt n k smen ele tirmesi kitab n kendine has zelliklerinden.

    25. Margaret Carmel on said:

      As a middle eastern studies student, this area of the world is very interesting to me While I learned a great deal, especially about WW1s affect on the Ottoman Empire, i wouldn t say this was a riveting read The modern section got dry with all of the parties and economics.I m definitely keeping this as a reference Great resource

    26. Aras on said:

      A perfect book for who are interested in the history of rising Turkish Republic The author were able to put forward the issues of last 195 years except of the years 2000 s because this masterpiece was completed in 1993.

    27. Pinar Gungor on said:

      Academic text without cross reference or descriptive footnotes This book is an excellent reference to whom wants to learn last era of Ottoman history and Turkish era since 1990s.

    28. Âme on said:

      zellikle yak n d nem T rkiye tarihiyle ilgili milliyet i tarih yaz m ndan istifra hissi gelmeye ba lam t ki sa olsunlar Bo azi i nde Jan Z rcher le verdiler antidotu Sonras geldi zaten.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *